You Can Discharge Almost Any Debt with Proper Use of the UCC
can discharge Secured Loans, Credit Card Debt, Student Loans, Auto
Loans, Assessments, Citations, Debts, Demands, Fines, Penalties, Tax
Liens and Judgments.
Debt Discharge and "Accepted for Value” is based on understanding how you've been mislead and learning what to do about it.
You just have to know How to Do It!
The History of How We Were Put Into the "Commerce Game”
On April 5, 1933, then President
Franklin Delano Roosevelt,
under Executive Order, issued April 5, 1933, declared: "All persons are
required to deliver on or before May 1, 1933 all Gold Coin, Gold
Bullion, and Gold Certificates now owned by them to a Federal Reserve
Bank, branch or agency, or to any member bank of the Federal Reserve
James A. Farley, Postmaster General at that time, required each
postmaster in the country to post a copy of the Executive Order in a
conspicuous place within each branch of the Post Office. On the bottom
of the posting was the following:
Criminal Penalties for Violation of Executive Order
$10, 000 fine or 10 years imprisonment, or both, as provided in Section 9 of the order.
Section 9 of the order reads as follows:
willfully violates any provisions of this Executive Order or of these
regulations or of any rule, regulation or license issued thereunder may
be fined not more than $10,000, or if a natural person, may be
imprisoned for not more than 10 years, or both; and any officer,
director or agency of any corporation who knowingly participates in any
such violation may be punished by a like fine, imprisonment, or both.
within a written document received September 17, 1997, from the U.S.
Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel, Office of the Deputy
Assistant Attorney General, Richard L. Shiffin, in response to a Freedom
of Information Act (FOIA), was the following:
fact that is frequently overlooked is that Executive Orders and
proclamations of the President normally have no direct effect upon
private persons or their property, and instead, normally constitute only
directives or instructions to officers or employees of the Federal
Government. The exception is those cases in which the President is
expressly authorized or required by laws enacted by the Congress to
issue an Executive order or proclamation dealing with the legal rights
or obligations of members of the public. Such as issuance of Selective
Service Regulations, establishment of boards to investigate certain
labor disputes, and establishment of quotas or fees with respect to
certain imports into this country."
It seems rather obvious that President Franklin D. Roosevelt was not
"expressly authorized or required" to "issue an Executive Order or
proclamation" demanding the public (private) to relinquish their
privately held gold.
The order (proclamation) issued by Roosevelt was an undisciplined act of
treason. Two months after the Executive Order, on June 5, 1933, the
Senate and House of Representatives, 73d Congress, 1st session, at 4:30
P.M. approve House Joint Resolution 192 (HJR-192) A Joint Resolution to
suspend the Gold Standard and abrogate the Gold Clause, Joint resolution
to assure uniform value to the coins and currencies of the United
HJR-192 states, in part, that "Every provision contained in or made with
respect to any obligation which purports to give the oblige a right to
require payment in gold or a particular kind of coin or currency, or in
any amount of money of the United States measured thereby, is declared
to be against public policy, and no such provision shall be contained in
or made with respect to any obligation hereafter incurred. Every
obligation, heretofore or hereafter incurred, whether or not any such
provisions is contained therein or made with respect thereto, shall be
discharged upon payment, dollar for dollar, in any such coin or currency
which at the time of payment is legal tender for public and private
HJR-192 goes on to state: "As used in this resolution, the term
'obligation' means an obligation (including every obligation of and to
the United States, excepting currency) payable in money of the United
States; and the term 'coin or currency' means coin or currency of the
United States, including Federal Reserve notes and circulating notes of
Federal Reserve banks and national banking associations."
HJR-192 superseded Public Law (that which passes as law today is only "color of law"), replacing it with public policy. This eliminated our ability to PAY our debts, allowing only for their DISCHARGE. When
we use any commercial paper (checks, drafts, warrants, federal reserve
notes, etc.), and accept it as money, we simply pass the unpaid debt
attached to the paper on to others, by way of our purchases and
transactions. This unpaid debt, under public policy, now carries a
public liability for its collection. In other words, all debt is now
The United States government, in order to provide necessary goods and
services, created a commercial bond (promissory note), by pledging the
property, labor, life and body of its citizens, as payment for the debt
(bankruptcy). This commercial bond made chattel (property) out of every
man, woman and child in the United States. We became nothing more than
"human resources" and collateral for the debt. This was without our
knowledge and/or our consent. How? It was done through the filing
(registration) of our birth certificates!
The United States government -actually the elected and appointed
administrators of government -took (and still do, to this day) certified
copies of all our birth certificates and placed them in the United
States Department of Commerce ... as registered securities. These
securities, each of which carries an estimated $1,000,000 (one million)
dollar value, have been (and still are) circulated around the world as
collateral for loans, entries on the asset side of ledgers, etc., just
like any other security. There's just one problem, we didn't authorize
The United States is a District of Columbia corporation. In Volume 20:
Corpus Juris Section 1785 we find "The United States government is a
foreign corporation with respect to a State"
re: Merriam 36 N.E. 505 1441 S. 0.1973, 14 L. Ed. 287).
Since a corporation is a fictitious "person" (it can not speak, see,
touch, smell, etc.), it can not, by itself, function in the real world.
It needs a conduit, a transmitting utility, a liaison of some sort, to
"connect" the fictional person, and fictional world in which it exists,
to the real world.
LIVING people exist in a real world, not a fictional, virtual world. But
government does exist in a fictional world, and can only deal directly
with other fictional or virtual persons, agencies, states, etc. In order
for a fictional person to deal with real people there must be a
connection, a liaison, and a go-between. This can be something as simple
as a contract. When both "persons," the real and the fictional, agree
to the terms of a contract, there is a connection, intercourse,
dealings, there is a communication, an exchange. There is business! But
there is another way for fictional government to deal with the real man
and woman: through the use of a representative, a liaison, and the
go-between. Who is this go-between, this liaison that connects fictional
government to real men and women? It's a government created shadow, a
fictional man or woman ... with the same name as ours.
This PERSON was created by using our birth certificates as the
Certificate of Origin (MCO) and the state in which we were born as the
"port of entry". This gave fictional government a fictional PERSON with
whom to deal directly. This PERSON is a strawman.
STRAMINEUS HOMO: Latin: A man of straw, one of no substance, put forward as bail or surety. This definition comes from Black's Law Dictionary, 6th. Edition, page 1421.
Following the definition of STRAMINEUS HOMO in Black's we find the next
word, Strawman. STRAWMAN: A front, a third party who is put up in name
only to take part in a transaction. Nominal party to a transaction; one
who acts as an agent for another for the purposes of taking title to
real property and executing whatever documents and instruments the
principal may direct. Person who purchases property for another to
conceal identity of real purchaser or to accomplish some purpose
otherwise not allowed. Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary defines
the term "strawman" as: 1: a weak or imaginary opposition set up only
to be easily confuted 2: a person set up to serve as a cover for a
usually questionable transaction. The Strawman can be summed up as an
imaginary, passive stand-in for the real participant; a front; a blind; a
person regarded as a nonentity. The Strawman is a "shadow", a
go-between. For quite some time a rather large number of people in this
country have known that a man or woman's name, written in ALL CAPS, or
last name first, does not identify real, living people. Taking this one
step further, the rules of grammar for the English language have no
provisions for the abbreviation of people's names, i.e. initials are not
to be used. As an example, John Adam Smith is correct. ANYTHING else is
not correct. Not Smith, John Adam or Smith, John A. or J. Smith or J.
A. Smith or JOHN ADAM SMITH or SMITH, JOHN or any other variation.
NOTHING, other than John Adam Smith identifies the real, living man. All
other appellations identify either a deceased man or a fictitious man:
such as a corporation or a STRAWMAN.
Over the years government, through its "public" school system, has
managed to pull the wool over our eyes and keep US ignorant of some very
important facts. Because all facets of the media (print, radio,
television) have an ever-increasing influence in our lives, and because
media is controlled (with the issuance of licenses, etc.) by government
and its agencies, we have slowly and systematically been led to believe
that any form/appellation of our names is, in fact, still us: as long as
the spelling is correct. WRONG!
We Were Never Told
We were never told, with full and open disclosure, what our government
officials were planning to do and why. We were never told that
government (the United States) was a corporation, a fictitious "person".
We were never told that government had quietly, almost secretly,
created a shadow, a STRAWMAN for each and every AMERICAN, so that
government could not only "control" the people, but also raise an almost
unlimited amount of revenue - so it could continue not just to exist,
but to GROW. We were never told that when government deals with the
STRAWMAN it is not dealing with real, living, men and women. We were
never told, openly and clearly with full disclosure of all the facts,
that since June 5, 1933, we have been unable to pay our debts. We were
never told that we had been pledged (and our children, and their
children, and their children, and on and on) as collateral, mere
chattel, for the debt created by government officials who committed
treason in doing so. We were never told that they quietly and cleverly
changed the rules, even the game itself, and that the world we perceive
as real is in fact fictional -and it's all for their benefit. We were
never told that the STRAWMAN -a fictional person, a creature of the
state -is subject to all the codes, statutes, rules, regulations,
ordinances, etc. decreed by government, but that WE, the real man and
woman, are not. We were never told we were being treated as property, as
slaves (albeit comfortably for some); while living in the land of the
free -and that we could, easily, walk away from the fraud.
Everything, Since June 1933, Operates in COMMERCE!
Commerce is based on agreement, on contract. Government has an implied agreement with
the STRAWMAN (government's creation) and the
is subject to government rule, as we illustrated above. But when we, the
real flesh and blood man and woman, step into their "process" we become
"surety" for the fictitious
Reality and fiction are reversed. We then become liable for the debts, liabilities and obligations of the SSTRAWMAN,
relinquishing our real (protected) character as we stand up for the fictional
So that we can once again place the
in the fictional world and ourselves in the real world (with all our
"shields" in place against fictional government) we must send a
nonnegotiable (private) "Charge Back" and a nonnegotiable "Bill of
Exchange" to the United States Secretary of Treasury, along with a copy
of our birth certificate, the evidence, the MCO, of the
By doing this we discharge our portion of the public debt, releasing us, the
real man or woman, from the debts, liabilities and obligations of the
Those debts, liabilities and obligations exist in the fictional
commercial world of "book entries", on computers and/or in paper
ledgers. It is a world of "digits" and "notes", not of money and
substance. Property of the real man once again becomes tax exempt and
free from levy, as it must be in accord with HJR-192.
Sending the nonnegotiable Charge Back and Bill of Exchange accesses our
Treasury Direct Account (TDA). What is our Treasury Direct Account?
According to one theorist, it is a pledge that was made for each birth
certificate in the amount of $630,000 (another pegs it at $1,000,000).
Thus everybody and everything in the United States is simply collateral
for the bonds issued by the U.S. government.
This $1,000,000 (one million) account is for the
the fictional "person" with the name in all caps and/or last name first.
It is there for the purpose of making book entries, to move figures,
"digits" from one side of ledgers to the other. Without constant
movement a shark will die and quite ironically, like the shark, there
must also be constant movement in commerce, or it too will die. Figures,
digits, the entries in ledgers must move from asset side to debit side
and back again, or commerce dies. No movement, no commerce.
The fictional person of government can only function in a fictional
commercial world, one where there is no real money, only fictional funds
... mere entries, figures, and digits.
A presentment from fictional government - whether traffic citation or
criminal charges - is a negative, commercial "claim" against the
This "claim" takes place in the commercial, fictional world of government. "Digits" move from one side of your
account to the other, or to a different account. This is today's commerce.
Playing the Commerce Game
In the past we have addressed these "claims" by fighting them in court,
with one "legal process" or another, and failed. We have played the
futile, legalistic, dog-and-pony show - a very clever distraction -
while the commerce game played on.
But what if we refused to play dog-and-pony, and played the commerce
game instead? What if we learned how to control the flow and movement of
entries, figures, and digits, for our own benefit? Is that possible?
How can the real man in the real world, function in the fictional world
in which the commerce game exists?
When in commerce do as commerce does, use the Uniform Commercial Code
(UCC). The UCC-1 Financing Statement is the one contract in the world
that canNOT be broken and it's the foundation of the Accepted for Value
process. The power of this document is awesome.
Since the TDA exists for the
-who, until now, has been controlled by government - We can gain control (and ownership) of the
by first activating the TDA and then filing an UCC-1 Financing Statement. This does two things for us.
First, by activating the TDA we gain limited control over the funds in
the account. This allows us to also move entries, figures, and digits
... for our benefit.
Secondly, by properly filing an UCC-1 Financing Statement we can become the holder in due course of the
This gives us virtual ownership of the government created entity.
Remember earlier we mentioned that a presentment from government or one
of its agents or agencies was a negative commercial claim against the
account, the TDA)? Remember we told you entries, figures, and digits
moved from one side of the account to the other, or to a different
account? Well now, with the
under our control, government has no access to the TDA and they also
lose their go-between, their liaison, their "connection" to the real,
living man and woman. From now on, when presented with a "claim"
(presentment) from government, we will agree with it (this removes the
"controversy") and we will ACCEPT IT FOR VALUE. By doing this we remove
the negative claim against our account and become the "holder in due
course" of the presentment. As holder in due course you can require the
sworn testimony of the presenter of the "claim" (under penalty of
perjury) and request the account be properly adjusted.
It's a commercial undertaking, and the basic procedure is not
complicated. In fact, it's fairly simple. We just have to remember a few
things, like: this is commerce, and we play by the rules of commerce.
We accept the "claim", become the holder in due course, and challenge
whether or not the presenter of the claim had/has the proper authority
(the Order) to make the claim (debit our account) in the first place.
When they cannot produce the Order (they never can, it was never issued)
we request the account be properly adjusted and the charge, the "claim”
is discharged and goes away.
If they don't adjust the account a request is made for the bookkeeping
records showing where the funds in question were assigned. This is done
by requesting the Fiduciary Tax Estimate and the Fiduciary Tax Return
for this claim. Since the claim has been accepted for value and is
prepaid, and our TDA account is exempt from levy, the request for the
Fiduciary Tax Estimate and the Fiduciary Tax Return is valid because the
information is necessary in determining who is delinquent and/or making
claims on the account. If there is no record of the Fiduciary Tax
Estimate and the Fiduciary Tax Return, we then request the individual
tax estimates and individual tax returns to determine if there is any
If we receive no favorable response to the above requests, we will then
file a currency report on the amount claimed/assessed against our
account and begin the commercial process that will force them to either
do what's required or lose everything they own - except for the clothing
they are wearing at the time. This is the power of contracts (commerce)
and it should be mentioned, at least this one time, that a contract
overrides the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and any other document
other than another contract. We should also mention that no process of
law - "color" of law under present codes, statutes, rules, regulations,
ordinances, etc. - can operate upon you, no agent and/or agency of
government (including courts) can gain jurisdiction over you, WITHOUT
YOUR CONSENT. You, (we) are not within their fictional commercial venue.
The Accepted for Value process, however, gives us the ability to deal
with "them" -through the use of our transmitting utility/go-between, the
Strawman -and hold them accountable in their own commercial world, for
any action(s) they attempt to take against us. Without a proper Order,
and now we know they're not in possession of such a document, they must
leave us alone ... or pay the consequences.
Yes, this process IS powerful -- and one had better learn it well - should one choose to utilize it.
Can it be used to make money? NO! Sight Drafts - NO! Bills of Exchange - NO!
Yes, it CAN set us free from government oppression and control.