ANSWER TO THE ENIGMA of a capitalized name
Canadian
Rights researcher Russell Porisky has conducted extensive studies into common law versus
Admiralty law, and its attendant natural persons versus legal fictions.
Porisky provides us with the answer. In book one of his five part study series
on, Canadian Rights and
Freedoms, Mr. Porisky – who describes himself as a "natural person," brings forth
definitions from two credible sources…
Gage Canadian Dictionary 1983 Sec. 4
defines Capitalize adj. as… "To take advantage of – To
use to ones own advantage."
Blacks Law Dictionary – Revised 4th
Edition 1968, provides a more comprehensive definition as follows …
Capitis Diminutio (meaning the diminishing of status
through the use of capitalization) – In Roman law. A diminishing or
abridgment of personality; a loss or curtailment of a man’s status or aggregate
of legal attributes and qualifications.
Capitis Diminutio Maxima (meaning a maximum loss of status
through the use of capitalization, e.g. JOHN DOE or DOE JOHN) – The highest
or most comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a man’s
condition was changed from one of freedom to one of bondage, when he became
a slave. It swept away with it all rights of citizenship and all family
rights.
Capitis Diminutio Media (meaning a medium loss of status
through the use of capitalization, e.g. John DOE) – A lessor or medium loss
of status. This occurred where a man loses his rights of citizenship,
but without losing his liberty. It carried away also the family rights.
Capitis Diminutio Minima (meaning a minimum loss of status
through the use of capitalization, e.g. John Doe) - The lowest or least
comprehensive degree of loss of status. This occurred where a man’s family
relations alone were changed. It happened upon the arrogation [pride] of a
person who had been his own master, (sui juris,) [of his own right, not under
any legal disability] or upon the emancipation of one who had been under the
patria potestas. [Parental authority] It left the rights of liberty and
citizenship unaltered. See Inst. 1, 16, pr.; 1, 2, 3; Dig. 4, 5, 11; Mackeld.
Rom.Law, 144.
Capite.
- Lat. By the head
Diminutio. – Lat. In civil law.
Diminution; a taking away; loss or depravation.
As Black’s Law
Dictionary explains, the full capitalization of the letters of one’s natural
name, results in a diminishing or complete loss of legal or citizenship status,
wherein one actually becomes a slave or an item of inventory. The method by
which the State causes a natural person to "volunteer" himself into
slavery, is through forming legal joinder, implied or stated, with the entity
or legal fiction (name all CAPS). Of course, most natural persons wouldn’t
willingly form such an unlawful but legally reductionist joinder, so trickery
and obfuscation are used. The initial joinder is formed when a legal Birth
Certificate is issued by the State, name in all CAPS. In fact, both the
Certificate of Birth AND Social Security number, are for "inventory"
control purposes, similar to the Amistad Schooner’s manifest or those numbers
or records used by legal entities or Corporations to
track, account for, use and dispose of inventory. It is under the Admiralty
jurisdiction Terri Schiavo’s fate
was determined, and under this alien fictional jurisdiction many of today’s
legal or other fictional entities such as "gay marriages" are
fabricated. Commensurate with color of law, they appear to "be," but
they are not. Indeed, under common law and the American Constitution, "gay
marriage" is unlawful and an oxymoron (contradiction). This, no legal
maneuver can change.
Whereas one may have
legal recourse in a Corporate or Admiralty Court, no lawful or moral remedy
will be found. Administrative directives of the legal tribunal or Admiralty
jurisdiction, while having the color or appearance of law, may be legal but are
in fact unlawful due to the nature or status of the Court’s origin, which is
predicated upon fiction. Admiralty Courts are in effect vastly inferior to the
intentions and authority of those who founded the American Constitutional
Republic. When searching America today, one would be hard
pressed to locate an authentic Constitutional or Common law Court. This
unlawful condition prevails in both Canada and the United States. A serious
breech of Constitutional fidelity surfaced recently, when it was discovered
Judges in Oregon were not properly sworn to uphold the Oregon Constitution and
therefore were acting without Constitutional authority. The Courts and Judges
in question, therefore, represent an alien power or entity.
It is worth noting the
causes for the Colonist revolt against England (it wasn’t the Boston tea party)…
On July 6 1775, a declaration by
the representatives of the united colonies of North America, met in Congress at
Philadelphia setting forth the Causes and necessity of
their taking up arms.
"…They (England) have
undertaken to give and grant our money without our consent (seizing from the
colonies the right to issue their own colonial script which destroyed the
colonial economy). Though we have ever exercised an exclusive right to dispose
of our own property; statutes have been passed for extending the jurisdiction
of courts of admiralty and vice-admiralty beyond their ancient limits; for
depriving us of the accustomed and inestimable privilege of trial by jury, in
cases affecting both life and property; for suspending the legislature of one
of the colonies; for interdicting all commerce to the capital of another; and
for altering fundamentally the form of government established by charter…"
Through obfuscation and
trickery America has been attacked and occupied by Corporate or pirate ships of
war, which are the privately owned Federal Reserve
and the IRS. Under Admiralty jurisdiction, commercial pirates have kidnapped
and commandeered the American people into servitude. In fact, American’s today
enjoy a legal status no different from that of the Amistad Africans had they
been found by the United States Supreme Court to be slaves or items of cargo
owned by Spain and/or Spain’s representatives. Under terms used to facilitate
slavery i.e., cargo, inventory etc., both Americans and Canadians now fall
under these definitions i.e., as articles of commerce under Admiralty law and
the UCC (Universal Commercial Code). America and Canada have been
surreptitiously hijacked by pirates under "color
of law." It should be emphasized; piracy and kidnapping are
crimes under most lawful jurisdictions. In law, today’s Admiralty courts are
accessories to piracy.
In all human endeavors,
it is the responsibility of each person to guard first his own dignity and
freedom, then the dignity and freedom of his family, community and fellow man.
Those who do not uplift and guard the freedom and dignity of their fellow human
beings little deserve it for themselves. John Quincy Adams was successful in
securing the freedom of his African defendants. Would it be he were here with
us today and that all Americans could be the black Africans he so eloquently
represented. His words are an inspiration for all time.
"Not slaves and therefore cannot be considered
merchandise, but are free individuals with certain ethical and moral rights,
including the right to engage in insurrection against those who would deny them
their freedom – When there appears no hope at all, one must invoke one’s
ancestors – who we are, is who we were and who we must become." [Anthony Hopkins as J.Q. Adams in the
movie Amistad]
Kevin
E. Abrams is not a product of Academia. Rather he is a lay
"psycho-historian," who studies the "who," and
"why" of history. Over the past 25 years, he has written on the
hidden history of the "gay" movement and other pertinent issues
dealing with human rights and freedoms. In 1995 Mr. Abrams co-authored The Pink
Swastika: Homosexuality in the Nazi Party with Mr. Scott Lively. The Pink
Swastika can be read on-line at, The Pink Swastika: Homosexuality In The Nazi Party - Fourth
Edition.
The preceding
was copied from:
La Amistad & Slave
Ship AMERICA
©
2005 Kevin E. Abrams – All Rights Reserved
The Following is the balance of the
article:
"By the blessing of God, I will argue the case
before the Supreme Court - I implore the mercy of God to control my temper, to
enlighten my soul, and to give me utterance, that I may prove myself in every
respect equal to the task." [John Quincy Adams]
At
the age of 74, elder member of Congress John Quincy Adams received a visitor at
his home in Massachusetts -- slavery abolitionist leader Lewis Tappan.
Tappan’s purpose was to
persuade "Old Man Eloquent" to argue his defendant’s case in
Washington in what today is remembered as the Amistad Trial.
In Steven Speilberg’s film Amistad, the essential ingredients of the trial
are brought forth, however, La Amistad also serves up a living template for
jurisdictional issues which today directly impact the freedoms, liberties and
human rights of both Americans AND Canadians. On Monday, February 22, 1841
Legal arguments commenced before the United States Supreme Court in Hartford
Connecticut. John Quincy Adams began his argument on February 24th. The
question to be decided by the nine Supreme Court Justices, was one of legal
jurisdiction. Their decision would mean slavery and death, or life and freedom
for the 36 black African defendants. Specifically, were these Africans items of
commerce or inventory as Spain and the Spanish slave traders maintained, or,
had these Africans been illegally kidnapped from their homes along the Ivory
Coast where slavery had been outlawed? Was their rebellion against enslavement,
in which the Africans killed all but two of their Spanish captors lawful, or not?
The trial became a contentious national issue, and as we shall see, La Amistad
is not only an important event which sailed into American history, but
ominously, an accurate and significant portrayal of America and her people
today – of Slave Ship America. We will explore and identify how we were
"volunteered," and how we "volunteer" ourselves into
servitude. We will also uncover the primary covert machinations employed by
self-appointed scientific and banking elite’s to maneuver and seduce freeborn
human beings into slavery. Ironically, all Americans have been reduced to the
same legal or commercial status the Spanish Crown sought to impose upon
Amistad’s African "inventory" just 164 years ago. Whereas we appear
to have come a long way in our cultural and legal battles for human rights, we
in fact have landed far from our intended shore. In today’s fictional courts,
all Americans are equally black.
"Any law that originates from the Constitution is
lawful. Any purported law that does not originate from it is a fictional law
without validity. The true test of any American law is whether it was created
according to lawful process or outside of lawful process." [July 2003 Idaho Observer]
Sir William Blackstone
of Blackstone’s Law Dictionary, with his many teachings on common law lays the
lawful foundation of the Constitutional Republic and American justice. Both
America and the Dominion of Canada were founded under common law jurisdiction
and the unalienable rights and freedoms enjoyed by our forefathers. The right
to life, liberty and property, for instance, are lawful claims not legal
privileges – the right to justice not sympathy. Legal privileges and sympathy
sway with the wind and times, whereas unalienable rights supersede convention
and legality. Lawful Government must uphold and protect the unalienable rights
of its born or naturalized citizens. However, there is a second status of
"person" or "individual" with which many people are
unfamiliar. This legal or fictional "person" can also be described as
similar to the straw man, as in the "persona" born without a brain in
the movie Wizard of Oz. This also describes the persona of a Corporation – a
legal fiction without a brain, except that is, for "its" articles of
incorporation that define "its" character and legal capacity. Due to
the fact, a Corporate entity has no life of "its" own, and that
"it" serves only itself, "it" must derive "its"
life from sources external to "itself" which is why Corporate
entities often become such liabilities to both the individual and community
within which they function. Unlike a natural person with autonomous volition,
an entity or legal fiction not only doesn’t have a brain, but also lacks the
ability to act morally. Indeed, Corporations often violate human rights codes
outlawing slavery by classifying natural persons as resources whom they include
in the sale of the Corporation or entity as "intellectual property"
or "good will." A straw man, legal fiction or entity could be likened
to the image of yourself when you look into a mirror. The image looks like or
has the "color" of you as in the "color of law," and even
moves like you, but, "it" is not the real flesh and blood you. However,
within the legal scheme of things, you "volunteer" to become this
image, fiction or entity through an involuntary or voluntary act of legal
joinder every time you file a domestic income tax return or apply for a drivers
license (invisible
contracts). This license is issued not to you, but
to the entity.
"It
is to the property of the citizen, not to the demand of the creditor of the
State, that the original faith of society is pledged. The claim of the citizen
is prior in time, paramount in title, and superior in quality." [Edmund Burke, Quoted in,
The Coming Battle
, Pub
by, Paul & Loraine Walter]
In his arguments before
the United States Supreme Court on behalf of the Amistad Africans, John Quincy
Adams states, "I derive consolation from the thought that this Court is a
Court of JUSTICE." Adams quotes from the 2,000 year old, "Institutes
of Justinian," meaning, "the constant and perpetual will to secure to
every one HIS OWN right." Adams also alludes to this mirror image, fiction
or "color of law" as, "that it said the thing which is not—too
unfortunately it was so, as he said." Meaning, the claims of the Spanish
Crown and slave traders, while having the color or appearance of law, were in
effect neither lawful nor predicated upon law at all. It must be noted, John Q.
Adams was acting as an advocate FOR the Africans, rather than as an interpreter
of the UCC or Universal Commercial Code which deals specifically with such
matters as commercial damage or loss claims as in the Amistad slave
"inventories" etc. In the strange world of legal fiction it is
doubtful Adams’ lawful arguments could even be heard today in any American
Court, including the Supreme Court, due to the fact the Supreme Court of the
United States is today no longer capable of even "hearing" a natural
or lawful person. In a future article, we will also explore how fraudulent
science promoted by tax exempt Foundations has co-opted and undermined the
American Constitution as the basis for American law and how this has extended
into all areas of American life.
For purposes of
understanding one’s legal or commercial status under the Admiralty system, it
is necessary to examine the curious use of all CAPS in legal and domestic
income tax forms. While seemingly a trite concern, this apparently small detail
has deep significance. In 2003 the Idaho Observer conducted an inquiry into the
meaning, or basis of capitalizing a natural person’s name in official
Government and legal documents. A proper answer was never found. However,
Canadian Rights researcher Russell Porisky has conducted extensive studies into
common law
versus Admiralty law, and its attendant natural persons versus legal
fictions. Porisky provides us with the answer. In book one of his five part
study series on, Canadian Rights and
Freedoms, Mr. Porisky – who describes himself as a "natural person," brings forth
definitions from two credible sources…
