For the average American this should be, beyond contention, the most
momentous, and consequential Supreme Court case ever tried…together, of course,
with the beautifully lucid TD 2313, which implements it. For, they nail down
two major points: the unambiguous and unarguable definition of the ‘United
States,’ and the income tax obligations of most Americans—due to their
relationship to this particular ‘United States’—namely, NONE.
It seems almost beyond belief that these two precious documents were ignored
by the American taxpayer, at the time. Reading them today, it is indeed
unfathomable that they did not become a watershed event, completely precluding
the events that have ensued. As it happened, however, not much happened until
over half a century later. But, since then, many thousands of previous
taxpayers have elected out of the system. In section 2 I mentioned where the
code permitted this, at 26 USC 6013 (g) Election to treat nonresident
alien individual as resident of the United States (4) Termination of election
(A) Revocation by taxpayers, which allows a nonresident alien to
re-establish his/her previous status (one time only—see subsection 5), after
having knowingly or unknowingly elected to "be treated as a resident
of the United States." (6013(g)(1).)
In other words, this is an escape hatch to get out of the system that one
almost always inadvertently entered, when filing his/her first Form 1040 in
order to get a refund, at the age of 14. One thereby declared oneself a resident
of the District United States, as well as a U.S. citizen, for tax
purposes. But, Section 6013
allows one to revoke this uninformed choice. I won’t go into why such relief
must be written into statutory law, but believe me, they wouldn’t do it if they
didn’t need to.
After pondering the matter, I have concluded that it is incumbent upon me to
at least reveal that there is, as I just discovered two weeks ago (this is
July, 00) a company that takes people through this process—by writing a minimum
of 22 letters!—and with results guaranteed. I spoke with the founder, as well
as reading the company’s sufficiently extensive literature—which was in
absolutely precise agreement with the interpretation in the instant paper.
I found him to be a very knowledgeable, sympathetic, and easygoing individual,
and I have no reason to doubt him when he says that his company has experienced
over 400 successes, in less than a year…and no failures. After all, why should
it, it is based on IRC regulations and each individual’s true state of affairs?
16. ‘U.S. residents’
and ‘state Citizens.’
In 1957 was published the second volume of an extremely important study, put
out by the federal government: Report of the Interdepartmental Committee for
the Study of Jurisdiction over Federal Areas with States. A text of the Law of
Legislation Jurisdiction. It established, in painstaking detail, that only
persons residing within the legislative jurisdiction of the U.S. Congress
are ‘residents’ of that jurisdiction—i.e., are ‘U.S. residents.’
It is made exhaustively manifest that this Congress does not extend the
jurisdiction of its legislative umbrella beyond the Constitutionally restricted
boundaries of territories of the United States, "belonging to" its "exclusive
sovereignty" "in all cases whatsoever," e.g. the federal
zone (D.C., the federal States, possessions, and enclaves). In other words, the
powers of the federal government are limited to and specifically defined at
1:8:17 of the Constitution, where Congress can:
exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases
whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square)…[which will]
become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and exercise like
Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the
State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines,
Arsenals, dock-Yards and other needful Buildings...
Of course, today it has got totally out of control, with the U.S. said to
"own" over 900,000 square miles of territory in the union
states!! (The size of Texas is 267,339 square miles.) But, this is another
story. Suffice it to say, the fact that it has happened does not make it legal
or lawful.
The state Citizen, then, is ‘alien’ to—is not subject to—the exclusive
jurisdiction and sovereignty of the territorial United States. Of course the
Frenchman who resides here must pay ‘income tax,’ but the American state
Citizen is almost totally free therefrom. (I qualify this elsewhere.) Remember
Matthew 17, 25-26?
‘Tell me, Simon, from whom do earthly monarchs
collect tribute money? From their own people, or from aliens [‘others’ or
‘strangers,’ in other translations]?’ ‘From aliens,’ said Peter. ‘Yes,’ said
Jesus, ‘and their own people are exempt.’ (KJV. Emphasis added.)
Most Americans are constitutionally exempt—just as sovereign state Citizens
are exempt from State income tax, which is very clearly spelled out in the
statutes…at least in those of the California Republic…as you will soon see.
Part of the process of restoring my state Citizenship status is revoking my
Birth Certificate through a process called REVOCATION OF SIGNATURE AND POWER OF
ATTORNEY. If my Birth Certificate is not revoked, then the courts consider me
to be a 14th Amendment federal citizen and my labor and all of my assets are
put up as collateral for the public debt.
When the government communicates with corporations it spells the name of the
corporation in all capital letters. If the government refers to you with your
name in all capital letters, it is actually means to treat you like a
corporation. A corporation is created by government. It has no rights. The
government gives it privileges and the corporation must follow the rules of its
creator. I am not a corporation! A state Citizen should challenge the
government's assertion that he/she is a corporation. This applies to both
postal matter and court documents.
