Admiralty and maritime rules of practice (which included libel procedures) were superseded, and civil and admiralty procedures in United States district courts were unified, effective July 1, 1966, see rule 1 and Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims, Appendix to this title.
Sec. 2461. Mode of recovery (a) Whenever a civil fine, penalty or pecuniary forfeiture is prescribed for the violation of an Act of Congress without specifying the mode of recovery or enforcement thereof, it may be recovered in a civil act
... Read more »
The language of the constitution is peculiar; it is technical; and it shows on the face of it an intention to limit the technical operation of attainders, not to limit the scope or extent of legislative penalties. If the authors of the constitution meant to say that Congress should pass no law punishing treason by attainder, or by its consequences, viz., forfeiture of estate, or corruption of blood, they would, in plain terms, have said so; and there would have been an end to the penalties of attainder, as there was an end to bills of attainder. Instead of saying, "Congress shall have the power to declare the punishment of treason, but shall not impose the penalties of attaind
... Read more »
Having shown that the United States being actually engaged in civil war, ---- in other words, having become a belligerent power, without formal declaration of war,--- it is important to ascertain what some of the rights of belligerents are, according to the law of nations. It will be observed that the law of nations is above the constitution of any government; and no people would be justified by its peculiar constitution in violating rights of other nations. With this caveat, it will be desirable to state some of the rights of belligerents. Either belligerent may seize and confiscate all the property of the enemy, on land or on the sea, including real as well as personal estate.
In reading the Book WAR POWERS, published in 1864, by Whiting, who was the Solicitor General of the War Department of The United States, it does not come as a shock to me that we are nothing but slaves of Congress, AKA the United States. Whiting was Lincoln's point man and developed the basis for Lincoln's justification of the War Policies. Whiting teamed up with Fancis Lieber who wrote the "Lieber Code" that we are now under. James Montgomery, a present day researcher, also has written extensively on the Reconstruction Acts and the Lieber Code and how they ... Read more »
Regardless of what you know, don't discuss it -- especially if you are
a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it's not reported, it didn't
happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.
2. Become incredulous and indignant.
Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can
be used to show the topic as being critical of some otherwise
sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the 'How dare you!'
gambit.
3. Create rumor mongers.
Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue
or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory
terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method which
works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the
public can learn of the fact
... Read more »
Casper's most recent update ( April 6, 2008 www.fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/nesara/news/news.php
)is a fairly accurate account of what has happened since 1933. However,
he has, like most historians, missed perhaps the most crucial piece of the
puzzle, namely the Exemption.
By analogy, consider that when you go to prison, everything of value
is taken from you - your time, your attention, your freedom, your ability to
function as a contributing member of society, th
... Read more »
We are witnessing the Chapter 7
liquidation of the corporate United States and the birth of a metals backed
economic system. The liquidation of this behemoth is a huge task which will not
be accomplished over night and will require us to suffer the existence of a
dual economic/banking system during the transition. The new metals backed
currency and banking system already exists and is operational. The bulk of the
funding is within this new system and is a currency of value and substance.
This is the currency of our future; A future without debt; A future of
abundance and prosperity. If at all possible this currency of value should not
be used for the satisfaction of any "Federal Reserve Note based debt”. Not to
say that this would not satisfy the debt. Indeed it would, but, why should one
give a currency of value to satisfy a dubious debt created out of thin air.
Certainly the banks hope that we do indeed give them our currency of value a
... Read more »
.jpg)
